Re: plpgsql function seems to be leaking memory
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plpgsql function seems to be leaking memory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 486114BF.7040901@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plpgsql function seems to be leaking memory (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: plpgsql function seems to be leaking memory
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane a écrit : > Marc Cousin <mcousin@sigma.fr> writes: >> I'm having a problem with plpgsql functions leaking memory. > > Your example shows absolutely no memory leak here, in either 8.3.3 > or CVS HEAD. > >> I see the postgresql process growing from 8MB to about 400 MB during this >> run... > > What do you have shared_buffers set to? I think you might be getting > fooled by top's treatment of shared memory (ie, it starts to count > shared pages after the process touches them for the first time). > That's what I thought at first when I saw Marc's email. I tried his example many times, with different values for shared_buffers. RSS column climbs until it reaches more or less the shared_buffers configuration. But, if I launch another psql, this process will have a much lower value on the RSS column. Shouldn't it get the RSS at the same value, even when the process starts ? I'm a bit puzzled by this column, anyone has a URL where I can find more info? Regards. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: