Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4861.1215832244@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3 ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > On Jul 11, 2008, at 19:18, Tom Lane wrote: >> I tried it here and didn't see any apparent memory leak, on two >> different systems. What platform are you testing on, and with >> what encoding/locale settings? > That's Mac OS X 10.5.4 "Leopard." Using en_US.UTF-8. Oh, got one of those too ... [ time passes ... ] Nope, no leak seen here either, though you could possibly fry an egg on my laptop right now ... Also, I notice that the Mac is the *only* one of the three systems on which your regression tests pass. You're depending way too much on platform-specific behavior there, I fear. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: