Re: case dumbiness in return from functions
От | Alban Hertroys |
---|---|
Тема | Re: case dumbiness in return from functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 485D882F-C087-4DAD-A2DC-EA4B49032678@solfertje.student.utwente.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: case dumbiness in return from functions (Nico Sabbi <nsabbi@officinedigitali.it>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 18, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Nico Sabbi wrote: > Tom Lane ha scritto: >> The SQL standard specifies that unquoted identifiers are case- >> insensitive. ^^^^^^^^ >> You're welcome to spell them as camelCase in your source code if you >> feel like it, but don't expect that PG, or any other SQL-compliant >> database, will pay attention. >> >> regards, tom lane > yet I find disturbing that Postgres doesn't make the effort > to respect the case specified by the user. If I created a field > called "REF" why should Postgres call it "ref" in the output of > queries > if the standard doesn't specify any obligation to convert the name ? If you want to use case sensitive identifiers, then quote them! It's not that hard. In your example above you're doing just that, so your statement does not even apply ;) Alban Hertroys -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest. !DSPAM:737,47909a669491882451502!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: