Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4858.909679966@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Yes. See include/catalog/template1_check.sql. Uses SQL to do checks.
Hmm. OK, that script has some overlap with what I did last night.
But is it run automatically? I think putting the checks into a
regression test is a better plan.
Also, in playing around with template1_check.sql, I discovered that
pg_operator OID 644
DATA(insert OID = 644 ( "<>" PGUID 0 b t f 30 30 16 644 649 0 0 oid8ne neqsel neqjoinsel ));
points to a nonexistent operator --- there is no oid8ne in pg_proc, nor
in the code... anyone feel like fixing it?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: