Re: [HACKERS] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication
Дата
Msg-id 4858.1484870985@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [JDBC] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication
Список pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Hmm ... that line was last touched by ab1f0c822, so I'm betting that
> I broke it somehow, but I'm not sure how.
> It looks like S_3 might have been parsed from a totally empty source
> string?  But if that's the trigger, I'd think it'd be entirely trivial
> to reproduce.

Oh, duh: the reason it's not trivial to reproduce is you have to try
to bind an empty prepared statement *in an already-aborted transaction*.

Will push a fix in a bit.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jorge Solórzano
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function