Re: "WIP: Data at rest encryption" patch and, PostgreSQL 11-beta3
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "WIP: Data at rest encryption" patch and, PostgreSQL 11-beta3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 485700a0-98b6-2fe0-fbab-bc789b59dca9@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "WIP: Data at rest encryption" patch and, PostgreSQL 11-beta3 (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: "WIP: Data at rest encryption" patch and, PostgreSQL 11-beta3
Re: "WIP: Data at rest encryption" patch and, PostgreSQL 11-beta3 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-06-17 11:23, Antonin Houska wrote: > I'm thinking how to teach postmaster to accept FEBE protocol connections > temporarily, just to receive the key. The user applications like pg_ctl, > initdb or pg_upgrade would retrieve the key / password from the DBA, then > start postmaster and send it the key. > > Perhaps the message format should be a bit generic so that extensions like > this can use it to receive their keys too. > > (The idea of an unix socket or named pipe I proposed upthread is not good > because it's harder to implement in a portable way.) How are the requirements here different from ssl_passphrase_command? Why do we need a new mechanism? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: