Re: b64_encode and decode
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: b64_encode and decode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4851AC15.5020009@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | b64_encode and decode (Marc Munro <marc@bloodnok.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: b64_encode and decode
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc Munro wrote: > I require base64 or some similar encoding scheme from a C language > extension and need it to be as fast as reasonably possible. In > src/backend/utils/adt/encode.c there are functions b64_encode and > b64_decode which would be ideal but these are defined static and so are > not available to my code. > > I know I could call these functions indirectly by calling binary_ecncode > through DirectFunctionCalln() but this is a whole lot more complexity > and overhead than I'd like. > > I note that /contrib/pgcrypto/pgp-armor.c appears to have its own copies > of these 2 functions and now I have elected to do the same. > > So, would there be any chance of redefining the base64 functions in > encode.c as extern to eliminate this redundancy? > > > Just how much complexity do you think calling binary_encode involves? You can probably do the whole thing in one or two lines of code. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: