Re: Overhauling GUCS
От | Ron Mayer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48484380.1010504@cheapcomplexdevices.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Overhauling GUCS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > How far could we get with the answers to just three questions: > > * How many concurrent queries do you expect to have? > * How much RAM space are you willing to let Postgres use? > * How much "overhead" disk space are you willing to let Postgres use? +1 to this approach - these are the kinds of questions that make sense to me when first setting up a new installation. They sound useful for both large servers and tiny (salesguy laptop for demos) installations. > If those aren't enough questions, what else must we ask? * Perhaps something to guess FSM settings? I think FSM is tunable I most often get wrong with more painful consequences(bloat) than other tunables. My approach is to have cron run database-wide vacuums even on systems with autovacuumjust to see the log messages about FSM. * Something to tune vacuum delay? Perhaps: How much I/O bandwidth can be dedicated to Postgres background activities?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: