Re: Rejecting weak passwords
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rejecting weak passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4848.1255962605@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rejecting weak passwords ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rejecting weak passwords
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> writes: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Password checks might include password complexity or non-reuse of >> passwords. This facility will require the client to send the password to >> the server in plain-text, so SSL and 'password' authentication is >> necessary to use this features. > So in my opinion that should be: > This facility will require to send new and changed password to > the server in plain-text, so it will require SSL, and the use > of encrypted passwords in CREATE/ALTER ROLE will have to be > disabled. Actually, not one word of *either* version should be in TODO. All of that is speculation about policies that a particular add-on module might or might not choose to enforce. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: