Re: is it a bug in rule system?
| От | laser |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: is it a bug in rule system? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 483D1EF5.7040409@pgsqldb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: is it a bug in rule system? ("A. Kretschmer" <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: is it a bug in rule system?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
A. Kretschmer wrote: > am Wed, dem 28.05.2008, um 15:56:22 +0800 mailte laser folgendes: > >> hi all, >> >> see query below: >> >> create table ruleTest(id integer, name text); >> >> create or replace rule ruleTest_insert_rule AS on insert to ruleTest >> where exists(select 1 from ruleTest where ruleTest.name = NEW.name) >> do instead (update ruleTest set id = id+1 where ruleTest.name = NEW.name); >> >> I think the id should be 1, cause the rule condition should only affect >> exist row, >> but ISTM the rule act like a DO ALSO rule: insert the row first, then >> update it. >> >> any hints? >> > > Yes, use a TRIGGER instead a RULE for such tasks. > > thanks, good to know it's a bug and we'll try TRIGGER approach. thanks and best regards -laser
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: