Re: tsearch2 on-demand dictionary loading & using functions in tsearch2
От | iSteve |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tsearch2 on-demand dictionary loading & using functions in tsearch2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48303817.2060404@bofh.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tsearch2 on-demand dictionary loading & using functions in tsearch2 (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Teodor Sigaev wrote: >> As for downsides, I only really see two: >> * Tracking updates of dictionaries - but it's reasonable to believe >> that new connections get open more often than the dictionary gets >> updated. Also, this might be easily solved by stat()-ing the >> dictionary file before starting up session, and only have the server >> reload it if there's a notified change. >> * Possibly complicated to implement? > > Keeping dictionary up to date - it's a most difficult part here. > Configuration of dictionary might be done by ALTER command - so, parent > process (and all currently running backends) should get that information > to reload dictionary. Hmm, good point; I presume "accept the fact that settings change won't propagate to other backends until reconnect" would not be acceptable behavior, even if documented along with the relevant configuration option? >> As for my second question, is it possible to use functions in >> tsearch2? For example, writing my own stemmer in PL/pgSQL or in C as a >> postgres function. > > Yes, of course, you can develop your dictionary (-ies) and parser. Dut > only in C, because they are critical for performance. I've had something different in mind. Considering there are already facilities to use functions, be it PL/pgSQL, PL/Python or C, why not just use those with the condition that the function must accept some-arguments and return some-result? Or would using this, even while using C as the language used for the actual parser, slow things down too? Best regards, Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: