Re: interesting check constraint behavior
От | Gauthier, Dave |
---|---|
Тема | Re: interesting check constraint behavior |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 482E80323A35A54498B8B70FF2B879800438460407@azsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: interesting check constraint behavior (Alban Hertroys <dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Both suggestions (exclude the 'null' from the list, and include "or col1 is null") work. And if I ever wanted to require that col1 is not null, just add that as a separate constraint. Thanks guys for the advise and explanation ! -----Original Message----- From: Alban Hertroys [mailto:dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl] Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 5:49 AM To: Gauthier, Dave Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] interesting check constraint behavior On 7 Jan 2010, at 24:12, Gauthier, Dave wrote: > thedb=# create table foo (col1 text, constraint chk check (col1 in ('a','b','c',null))); > CREATE TABLE > thedb=# insert into foo (col1) values ('xxx'); > INSERT 0 1 > > Hmmmm... I would have thought that this would have violated the constraint because 'xxx' is not null and nit one of theallowed values. As Tom already explained, "value in ('yada', 'yada', null)" evaluates to null. You'll need to make sure your check expressionevaluates to either true or false - not null. I guess you need: check(col1 in ('a', 'b', 'c') or col1 is null) Alban Hertroys -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest. !DSPAM:1015,4b45bc2510731992717809!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: