Re: Need for help!
От | Justin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Need for help! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 482C7E61.2030407@emproshunts.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Need for help! ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Need for help!
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe wrote:
From every thing i have read about Hyper Threading, it should be just turned off. There is so much over head to process, it killed its own performance if the application was not designed to take advantage of it.. A really cool idea that proved unfeasible at the time.On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Shane Ambler <pgsql@sheeky.biz> wrote:Semi Noob wrote:My CPU is 2CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz. Disk: disk system is RAID-5;Early versions of postgresql had issues with P4 HT CPU's but I believe they have been resolved. I am quite certain that it only related to the early P4's not the Xeon.The real problem was with the various OS kernels not know how to treat a HT "core" versus a real core. Linux in particular was a bad performer with HT turned on, and pgsql made it suffer more than many other apps for not knowing the difference. The linux kernel has known for some time now how to treat a HT core properly.
Intel is says its bringing back hyper threading for Nehalem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehalem_(CPU_architecture)
If you can i would turn it off and see what the results are
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: