Re: Returning RECORD from PGSQL without custom type?

Tom Lane wrote:
> "D. Dante Lorenso" <dante@lorenso.com> writes:
>> I'd like to be able to do this:
>>
>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "my_custom_func" (in_value bigint)
>> RETURNS SETOF (col1name BIGINT, col2name TEXT, ...) AS
>
> You realize of course that you can do this *today* if you use OUT
> parameters?

No, I didn't realize.  I always assumed OUT parameters were like return
values from a function ... like:

   (out1, out2, out3) = somefunction (in1, in2, in3);

I never realized you could return a SETOF those OUT parameters.  I guess
it wasn't intuitive, but I'm learning this now.

I think all the functionality I want DOES already exist.  Let me go work
with it.  Thanks.

-- Dante




>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "my_custom_func" (in_value bigint,
>   OUT col1name BIGINT, OUT col2name TEXT, ...)
>   RETURNS SETOF RECORD AS
>
> The TABLE syntax is a bit more standards-compliant maybe, but it's not
> offering any actual new functionality.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>