Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48262637.7070100@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jonah H. Harris wrote: > Yes, I just think PREBUILT conveys the meaning of the command more > appropriately. I could care less though. > (Please don't top-answer) I don't think we should add new keywords unnecessarily. cheers andrew > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >>> So, would anyone be averse to something like the following: >>> >>> ALTER TABLE blah ADD ... PRIMARY KEY (...) USING PREBUILT INDEX index_hame >>> >>> If the user doesn't specify CONSTRAINT constraint_name, it will >>> default to current implicit behavior of col_pkey. >>> >> This is all so that the primary key shows up with a nice "PRIMARY KEY" instead >> of just the unique index? >> >> The "PREBUILT" seems unnecessary in that syntax. >> >> -- >> Gregory Stark >> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com >> Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support! >> >> > > > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: