Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": readonly 0 of 8192 bytes

On 08/09/2018 01:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Oooh ... but pg_class wouldn't be big enough to get a parallel
>>> index rebuild during that test, would it?
>> Typically not, but I don't think that we can rule it out right away.
> Hmmm ... maybe we should temporarily stick in an elog(LOG) showing whether
> a parallel build happened or not, so that we can check the buildfarm logs
> next time we see that failure?
>
>> I don't know all that much about the buildfarm client code, and it's
>> late.
> It doesn't really stick in any undocumented configuration changes,
> AFAIK.  Possibly Andrew would have some more insight.



No, everything should be visible in the config. Hidden things are what I 
try to avoid.

The only things the configure()  adds are the prefix and pgport 
settings, and the cache-file. make() only adds a "-j jobs" if so 
configured. make_check() normally just runs "make NO_LOCALE=1 check".



cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services