Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)
| От | Geoffrey |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4808E8BA.1060709@serioustechnology.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon) ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:54:52 -0400 > Geoffrey <lists@serioustechnology.com> wrote: > >> What about the: >> >> 8.1 -> slony -> 8.3 >> switch users to 8.3 databases >> >> solution. > > Is it? What is your transactional velocity? How long will the initial > sync transaction have to run? You know vacuum isn't working while > that transaction is open right? Are you going to have to setup up a > dozen different replicated sets in order to get it done? > > Slony works in "some" cases it does not work in all nor the most > critical (in terms of large sets with minimal downtime requirement). I don't know that slony is the answer. It was more of a question then an answer. We are hoping to use that solution to migrate from 7.4.19 to 8.3.1. The primary reason is to reduce downtime. -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: