Re: Is the shoe on the foot?
От | Brian Hurt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is the shoe on the foot? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4808AF70.5000405@janestcapital.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is the shoe on the foot? ("Richard Broersma" <richard.broersma@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is the shoe on the foot?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Richard Broersma wrote: >I used to kringe when PostgreSQL articles were posted on Slashdot. It >seemed that so many liked to spread FUD about how slow PostgreSQL was. > >However it seems that MySQL is getting the FUD now and everyone seems >to have forgotten about the PostgreSQL FUD. > >http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?no_d2=1&sid=08/04/16/2337224 > > > I'm not sure this qualifies as FUD. I mean, generally FUD implies that the problems are illegitimate- the classic example was the IBM salesman warning customers to beware of being locked into an open solution. This problem (the possibility/probability that Sun will close-source all or part of MySQL) is a legitimate concern. They're legally entitled to, and there is a financial argument in favor of them doing it (they need to better "leverage" their IP to help pay for the cost of buying the company). Personally, I think it'll backfire, and destroy MySQL's popularity (especially considering there is a free, fast, *superior* solution out there for people to switch to). Five years ago, when MySQL still had a significant performance advantage, maybe it'd have worked, but not now. But in any case, the possibility that Sun will do this is a real, legitimate concern, and thus not FUD, for MySQL users. Brian
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: