Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix detection of pwritev support for OSX.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix detection of pwritev support for OSX. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 480660.1611071845@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix detection of pwritev support for OSX. (James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix detection of pwritev support for OSX.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:27 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> We already dealt with that by not selecting an SDK newer than the >> underlying OS (see 4823621db). > Tried that, doesn't work, not even sure how it could possibly fix this > issue at all, It worked for me and for Sergey, so we need to figure out what's different about your setup. What do you get from "xcrun --show-sdk-path" and "xcrun --sdk macosx --show-sdk-path"? What have you got under /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs ? > this can not be fixed properly by selecting a specific SDK version > alone, it's the symbols valid for a specific target deployment version > that matters here. I don't think I believe that argument. As a counterexample, supposing that somebody were intentionally cross-compiling on an older OSX platform but using a newer SDK, shouldn't they get an executable suited to the SDK's target version? (I realize that Apple thinks we ought to handle that through run-time not compile-time adaptation, but I have no interest in going there.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: