Re: Which Python library - psycopg2 or pygresql?
От | Steve Crawford |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Which Python library - psycopg2 or pygresql? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4804D5FF.8000403@pinpointresearch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Which Python library - psycopg2 or pygresql? ("Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Which Python library - psycopg2 or pygresql?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Dawid Kuroczko wrote: > So I thought, "lets learn a bit of Python", and I stumbled upon > a choice of these two libraries. Whch would you suggest? > How do they differ? > Well, pygresql seems unmaintained since mid 2006 and the psycopg2 site is currently and regularly down. Neither inspires confidence. As to differences, here's one: Using pygresql ... result=db.query('select false as booltest') boolean_result = result.dictresult()[0]['booltest'] print boolean_result if boolean_result: print "The result was true" else: print "The result was false" This prints: f The result was true Huh? Seems that pygresql treats boolean as character 't' or 'f', python evaluates both as 'true' and hilarity ensues. (Yes, I just spent some "quality time" tracking a bug in a script that used pygresql and had a loop with a test of a boolean column.) Using psycopg2: ... cur.execute('select false as booltest') boolean_result = cur.fetchall()[0][0] print boolean_result if boolean_result: print "The result was true" else: print "The result was false" This prints: False The result was false There was a brief discussion at the PG users group last week and the bias was toward psycopg2. Cheers, Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: