Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index AM change proposals, redux |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48005567.3020304@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index AM change proposals, redux (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ron Mayer wrote: > One use case that I think GIT would help a lot with are my > large address tables that are clustered by zip-code but > often queried by State, City, County, School District, > Police Beat, etc. Yep, GIT would shrink the index on zip-code tremendously... > I imagine a GIT index on "state" would just occupy > a couple pages at most regardless of how large the > table gets. .. Not quite that much, though. GIT still stores one index pointer per heap page even on a fully clustered table. Otherwise it's not much good for searches. > And likewise, even an index on City > would be orders of magnitude smaller than the existing > ones; since all records for any given city are all > on the same few disk pages. Yep, it would help with that as well. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: