Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47ddb016-a6e7-0ca1-a035-cdc64c31bdfd@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL (Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL
Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/03/17 19:50, Peter van Hardenberg wrote: > Anecdotally, we just stored dates as strings and used a convention (key > ends in "_at", I believe) to interpret them. The lack of support for > dates in JSON is well-known, universally decried... and not a problem > the PostgreSQL community can fix. > The original complain was about JSON_VALUE extracting date but I don't understand why there is problem with that, the SQL/JSON defines that behavior. The RETURNING clause there is more or less just shorthand for casting with some advanced options. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: