On 04/10/2017 09:04 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2017, at 16:42, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 4/8/17 04:50, Michael Banck wrote:
>>> "Client-Side Connection-Failover"
>>
>> I don't think the libpq feature can be considered "failover". It just
>> picks from a list of end points on the initial connection attempt. It
>> does not discover connection failures and reconnect.
>
> Yeah, after reading Roberts blog post, I'd also agree that "failover"
> is a bad/misleading (in the "automatic" sense) description for it.
Alternate phrasing?
I do want to get this in the "extended list" of features, just because
we want driver authors to add support for it.
--
Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!