Re: Concurrent psql patch
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47FC1FEA.3040103@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Concurrent psql patch (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Concurrent psql patch
Re: Concurrent psql patch |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> >>> This has been saved for the next commit-fest: >>> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold >>> >> Er, why "saved"? Until there's a new patch submission there's not going >> to be more work to do on this in the next fest. >> >> I think maybe you need to think a bit harder about the distinction >> between your TODO-items-in-waiting list and the commit fest queue. >> I was willing to wade through a pile of TODO-items-in-waiting this >> time, because I pressed you to make the list available before having >> sorted through it; but I'm not going to be pleased to see those same >> threads in the fest queue next time, unless someone's done some actual >> work in between. >> > > It is in the next fest so I will remember to ask if people have done any > work on them --- if not they are either deleted or moved to the next > commit fest. > > Are you suggesting we just delete the threads and let them die if they > don't submit a new version? > > My understanding was that all items in a commit-fest have one of these three dispositions: . committed . rejected . referred back to author for more work We're really only interested in the third one here, and so, yes, the ball should be in the author's court, not yours. I don't see any reason for you to move items from one queue to another like that. It just looks like it's making work. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: