Re: modules
От | Tino Wildenhain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: modules |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47F9166B.7000801@wildenhain.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: modules ("D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: ... > Yes but what I am suggesting goes beyond that. My idea is that there > is a modules directory that contains a file for each installable > module. This file would contain all the information about the module > such as name, version, where to get the actual package, an MD5 checksum > of the package, minimum and maximum PostgreSQL versions required, etc. I'd suggest the approach taken by debian apt rather then pkgsrc - instead of maintaining a whole directory structure on client side have a couple of files as database - I guess even using the database itself would work - and RDP (basically xml over http) which would be different from apt approach but we are dealing with much less modules. The most important thing we could learn from apt is to use cryptography to secure installed modules - instead of just maintaining package integrity with md5. After all, a database module can do almost everything - so I'd rather know if I trust the packager. Just my 0.2c Tino
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: