Re: modules
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: modules |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47F50E91.2040606@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: modules ("D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: modules
Re: modules |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > > In fact, this may be the way to deprecate contrib. Start building > modules and move the contrib packages to it one at a time. That way > people using contrib have some time to switch and we can point people > to modules if they are just starting out. > > Is there support for this idea? I would like to start exploring this > if so. > > No. I don't want to deprecate it, I want to get rid of it, lock, stock and barrel. If you think that we need more than renaming then we can discuss it, but I don't want a long death, I want one that is certain and swift. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: