Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>> The fundamental problem I've got with this patch is that it adds 400K
>> of new code (and that's just the code, not counting documentation or
>> regression tests) that we'll have to maintain, to obtain a feature that
>> so far as I've heard there is precisely zero demand for.
>>
>
> We have a customer that wants to use it as part of a MySQL-to-Postgres
> migration.
>
>
Using an implementation like this? I suspect anyone wanting to migrate
their existing SQL/PSM stuff to Postgres will be less than impressed by
our "function body as a string" mechanism.
cheers
andrew