Re: Documentation problem with LargeObjectManager
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation problem with LargeObjectManager |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47F0645A.6010605@ejurka.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Documentation problem with LargeObjectManager (David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Documentation problem with LargeObjectManager
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
David Goodenough wrote: > In http://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/82/binary-data.html it says that > the return from LargeObjectManager.create is a long, but the actual code > seems to return an int, which is also what the read and write methods seem > to want as OID. Is this a code or a documentation problem? The docs are > the same for 8.3. > The docs refer to createLO which does return long, not create which returns int. OID is unsigned int, but since Java doesn't have unsigned types we need to use long. This was added relatively recently, as the original API didn't consider that requirement, so that's why we have a slight mix of function signatures. In any case you should be using the long versions and the int versions should be marked as deprecated. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: