Re: dunction issue
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dunction issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47EE7EB9.6010801@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dunction issue (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Sam Mason wrote: >> Occasionally, though, I do have something where the DB-using app must >> just submit a request to the DB and see if it works. Either the UI >> doesn't have the privileges to run the same checks its self, or they're >> just too expensive to do from the client (or to do twice). In those >> cases I start to find Pg's error reporting frustrating, and I either >> resort to a "return value" sort of approach or embed a unique error code >> and some parseable values in the exception string. Eg: >> >> Some kind of human-readable error description goes here >> [ERR114:ID=12200;CONFLICTING-ID=1111] >> >> It's not pretty, but it works. >> > > sounds sensible. Do any other databaes/other tools work better that you > know of? I keep looking for projects, but this could end up touching > quite a lot of code. > Unfortunately I don't know of anything that already does this sort of more detailed exception reporting. Being able to access: - Individual exception substitution values with their original types or as text; - The original exception text with substituted-in values but no context/location information; and - A user-specified exception "code" or subtype for PL/PgSQL-thrown exceptions would be *so* nice. Even just the last one would make a big difference I think. Anybody have any idea how tricky that might be to implement while maintaining 3.0 protocol compatibility for existing DB interfaces? It might be a pretty cool GSoC project, though I suspect it might involve a bit too much of Pg's internals. Am I the only one who'd want something like that, or does it sound like something that might be a worthwhile wishlist/distant-todo item? -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: