Re: PostgreSQL website translations
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL website translations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47EBA9F4.3000207@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL website translations ("Adrian Maier" <adrian.maier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL website translations
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Adrian Maier a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> Adrian Maier wrote: >> > Perhaps we could something like : every translated contains >> > a comment with the date+time+revision of the corresponding >> > English page ? at least this would make it possible to >> > manually manage the corresponding English revision for a given >> > translated page. >> >> Perhaps we could use a custom svn property for that? That would likely >> make it easier to process automatically to pull out differences and >> such. And perhaps some wrapper scripts around svn to help you set >> things automatically? > > I haven't used such custom properties. As long as such a property can > be set for individual files , it seems to be a better (more reliable) solution > compared to relying on comments. Some scripts for using this facility > would be a significant progress . > There's something I don't quite understand. What's the interest in having these comments (or custom svn properties) ? Tell me if I'm wrong. This is what we want to achieve : we want to know if a specific translated webpage is out of date Problem is : * translator checks out a file * during the translation, someone else checks out the file * and commit itschanges * then translator commits its new translation Using the modification date doesn't help us because the translation file will be newer than the english one. Using the svn revision does not help us because the translation file will have a revision newer than the english one. So, your idea seems to put the revision of the english file in a comment or in a custom property. So, it's a manual change : * translator checks out a file * he updates the comment of the translation with the revision of the english file * hetranslates * he commits Is that right ? And when the web server needs to choose between the english file and the translated one, it parses the translated one to get the revision put in comments, it gets the current revision of the english files and it finally compares them ? Could work, but we still rely on the translator good will. No automatic process here. Or am I wrong ? -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: