Re: New email list for emergency communications
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New email list for emergency communications |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47E9E307.7030504@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New email list for emergency communications ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> I have IRC ops too. But I am really looking for something that notifies >> me that there is a problem, rather than having me go looking for >> information. If email is down, people should be able to subscribe to >> alerts and status reports. > > 'k, I can guarantee you that if/when there is a problem, my focus is going to > be on *fixing* the problem, not sending out status messages to the effect of > "its still down" ... Any reliable network infrastructure will have the ability for the users of that infrastructure to get a status update on a particular problem. I am able to do this even with my uber cheap DSL line. I call the status line when there is a problem and a nice little attendant says, "Yo... we know there is a problem in hood river, ETA to fix, 2 hours". Do I think it is reasonable that Marc or anyone else start sending out status messages? No. Do I think it is reasonable that when there is a problem that a ticket be created on pmt.postgresql.org that describes the problem, and when the problem is fixed (or if the problem is going to be longer term), that ticket be updated and closed? Yes. We are either a network of professionals supporting an infrastructure, or were not. Whether we like it or not, the moment we agreed to be on sysadmins@, postgresql.org became our customer. We should act like they are our customer and provide the relevant and appropriate customer communications. That means, tickets, updates, communication, and documentation. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: