Re: Integer datetimes
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Integer datetimes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47E8B4A9.3060708@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Integer datetimes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane napsal(a): > Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: >> Tom Lane napsal(a): >>> This is not happening, at least not without 100 times more work than >>> anyone has shown willingness to put into the issue. > >> I understand your arguments, but it is important for in-place upgrade. > > No, it is not, you merely need to be sure the new version is configured > the same as the old ... which is a requirement anyway. It depends. For example, currently postgreSQL allows only collation setting per database, but somebody will develop collation per database or column. After that the situation will be different. Upgrade have to transfer collation from control file to catalog and so on. Configuration will be different but there will be possible transition. Probably all packager will delivery 8.4 and newer with integer datetime, but people who will use in-place upgrade they will not use official package. I think it is not good idea. Zdenek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: