Deferrable NOT NULL REFERENCES ... for two-way referential relationship
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Deferrable NOT NULL REFERENCES ... for two-way referential relationship |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47E8AFDE.1080905@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Deferrable NOT NULL REFERENCES ... for two-way referential
relationship (SOLVED?)
Re: Deferrable NOT NULL REFERENCES ... for two-way referential relationship |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Hi all I'm running into an issue with my schema where I'm trying to establish a mandatory two-way relationship between two entities, and I'm hoping for some external wisdom. Using "customer" and "address" by way of example: CREATE TABLE customer (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,address_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES address(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLYDEFERRED ) CREATE TABLE address (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,customer_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES customer(id) ) Every customer must have one or more addresses, ie address_id must be set to a valid address by commit time. It does not matter which address it's set to (though in this particular app there is in fact a preferred address). If it could be written as a CHECK constraint I'd be trying to enforce: CONSTRAINT address_id_exists CHECK ( EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM address WHERE address.id = address_id) ) DEFERRABLE INITIALLYDEFERRED; ... on the customer table. PostgreSQL supports DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED for the foreign key constraint, but unless I'm missing something it doesn't appear to have any direct way to make the NOT NULL check deferrable. There are constraint triggers: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/sql-createconstraint.html and I could use one to enforce the NOT NULL on the table as a whole (at an acceptable cost in this case). However, I've seen some posts like this one: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-01/msg00882.php that suggest that constraint triggers are or have been deprecated. However, their removal is no longer on the TODO as far as I can tell. Are constraint triggers a safe and reasonably future proof way to implement this, given that I'm quite OK with being tied to postgresql? Is there some better way that I'm missing? Is what I'm trying to do crazy for some reason I haven't spotted? -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: