Re: Integer datetimes
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Integer datetimes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47E81AF1.5030701@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Integer datetimes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Integer datetimes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane napsal(a): > Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: >> The result will be two datatypes datetime and timestamp_int or timestamp_float. > > This is not happening, at least not without 100 times more work than > anyone has shown willingness to put into the issue. It seems fairly > clear that everyone thinks the int64 datatypes will be the mainstream > usage, and the float implementation will be interesting only on very > old platforms or for very specialized applications. I cannot see us > putting in the effort needed to refactor the code as two > simultaneously-available datatypes. I understand your arguments, but it is important for in-place upgrade. If you will start new postgreSQL on e.g 8.3 database cluster, you need method how to process floating point timestamp. Minimal we need to have cast from floating point timestamp to integer timestamp. I put it on my ToDo with low priority. Zdenek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: