Re: slow pg_connect()
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: slow pg_connect() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47E76087.3050901@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: slow pg_connect() (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Craig Ringer wrote: > firerox@centrum.cz wrote: >> It takes more then 0.05s :( >> >> Only this function reduce server speed max to 20request per second. >> > If you need that sort of frequent database access, you might want to > look into: > > - Doing more work in each connection and reducing the number of > connections required; > - Using multiple connections in parallel; > - Pooling connections so you don't need to create a new one for every > job; > - Using a more efficient database connector and/or language; > - Dispatching requests to a persistent database access provider that's > always connected > Oh, I missed: Use a UNIX domain socket rather than a TCP/IP local socket. Database interfaces that support UNIX sockets (like psycopg) will normally do this if you omit the host argument entirely. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: