Re: Integer datetimes
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Integer datetimes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47E381A2.2070905@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Integer datetimes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Integer datetimes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane napsal(a): > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: >> Neil Conway wrote: >>> Sure -- I sent in a patch earlier, but I'll post an updated version >>> shortly. > >> Hmm, I mean just switching the default value in configure.in ... is >> there anything else that needs doing at this point? > > Well, that's hardly a one-liner. If nothing else there are probably > multiple places in the documentation that need adjustment. > Does we keep same OID for this type? I prefer to redefine it as new type. It helps to determine which type is it for upgrade purpose. I think best solution is to have both code floating/int active and configure or initdb only perform correct linking in BKI file to preferred variant. The result will be two datatypes datetime and timestamp_int or timestamp_float. Or maybe better is to have two datatypes timestamp_int timestamp_float and one domain timestamp which points to preferred type. Zdenek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: