Re: Commitfest process
От | Andrew Chernow |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commitfest process |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47D1DC94.5060901@esilo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commitfest process (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> This is reasonable for the sort of medium-to-large patch that the author > has put a lot of time into. But we also get a lot of small one-off > patches where it's not so reasonable. Now of course many of those get > applied right away, but not all. > Just a thought... maybe a distinction should be made between "quick-fix" patches and things that would require more review due to behavior changes or new features. Seems reasonable to treat something like HOT and a one line patch differently. Not sure where the magic line would be drawn: size of patch, is it a bug fix or a new feature, requires extensive testing (more time), etc... I do think it is overkill to have a wiki entry for a one line patch with a 30 minute life-span (either thrown out or applied). -- Andrew Chernow eSilo, LLC every bit counts http://www.esilo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: