Re: Permanent settings
От | Ron Mayer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Permanent settings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47BDAC7F.3040306@cheapcomplexdevices.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Permanent settings (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote: > If they don't have an actual database, it's fairly common to use SQLite or > similar just to get proper database storage for it. With all the concern about parsing in this thread, perhaps it's best if this config-overrides file not be of the same syntax as postgresql.conf at all. If the interactive form of these overrides will be "SET PERMANENTLY work_mem TO 65MB;", why not make the override config file use the same syntax; since a parser for it'll have to exist anyway? Maybe some XML bloat. Or, since you mentioned it, perhaps SQLite itself, since some people on the thread seem to want sql-like syntaxes to maintain it? [Personally, we maintain perl scripts that apply patches to the default postgresql.conf; and check those in to source control. I don't think I'd use this override file feature.]
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: