Re: Permanent settings
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Permanent settings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47BD9F81.8000808@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Permanent settings ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Permanent settings
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake napsal(a): > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:22:42 -0300 > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > >> Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >>> IMO this should all be in the database and that's it. The idea that >>> our global settings are in a file seems unusual consider we have a >>> perfectly good storage engine available. >> That doesn't work, because many settings must be loaded before the >> database is fully operational. > > Right but couldn't that be changed or if not, why not only have the > settings that "must" be loaded before the database is fully operation > in the postgresql.conf file. > > I can hear the wails of we don't want multiple configuration sources > but we already have multiple configuration sources and having 90% of > the configuration in the database should would make it easier. I like this idea. By my opinion only GUC variable with PGC_POSTMASTER context must be in postgresql.conf. Most of them are related to memory and networking configuration. Other can be only store in database. And for startup, default value will work pretty well. By the way, why postgresql.conf is required for startup when I'm able setup all parameter on command line? Zdenek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: