Re: Benchmark Data requested
От | Jignesh K. Shah |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Benchmark Data requested |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47A88B6F.8070905@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Benchmark Data requested (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
One of the problems with "Empty Table optimization" is that if there are indexes created then it is considered as no longer empty. Commercial databases have options like "IRRECOVERABLE" clause along with DISK PARTITIONS and CPU partitions for their bulk loaders. So one option turns off logging, disk partitions create multiple processes to read various lines/blocks from input file and other various blocks to clean up the bufferpools to disk and CPU partitions to process the various blocks/lines read for their format and put the rows in bufferpool if successful. Regards, Jignesh Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 15:05 +0000, Richard Huxton wrote: > > >>> Only by locking the table, which serializes access, which then slows you >>> down or at least restricts other options. Plus if you use pg_loader then >>> you'll find only the first few rows optimized and all the rest not. >>> >> Hmm - the table-locking requirement is true enough, but why would >> pg_loader cause problems after the first few rows? >> > > It runs a stream of COPY statements, so only first would be optimized > with the "empty table optimization". > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: