Re: BUG #3913: pg_dump -T option not recognised
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #3913: pg_dump -T option not recognised |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47A081C2.6050701@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #3913: pg_dump -T option not recognised ("David Dunwoody" <david.dunwoody@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hmm, strange. Can you reproduce it on different machine/system? It seems more problem with getopt in your installation. Check if you have installed updated version of (g)libc. Zdenek David Dunwoody wrote: > Checked several times, and I was working in a pair, so I have a witness. > :) It is, of course, possible that it's peculiar to something during the > compile on my machine, but I've reproduced this on a clean install from > source (./configure && make && make install). > > Seems remarkable that it really is a bug, as I find it hard to believe > I'm the first person to use the short opt, but thought it best to report it! > > Cheers, > > David > > > > On 30/01/2008, *Zdenek Kotala* <Zdenek.Kotala@sun.com > <mailto:Zdenek.Kotala@sun.com>> wrote: > > David Dunwoody wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > > > Bug reference: 3913 > > Logged by: David Dunwoody > > Email address: david.dunwoody@gmail.com > <mailto:david.dunwoody@gmail.com> > > PostgreSQL version: 8.2.6 > > Operating system: SuSE 8.2.6 > > Description: pg_dump -T option not recognised > > Details: > > > > When running pg_dump, the -T option for table exclusion is > ignored, but > > --exclude-table does work. > > > > Compiled from source. > > It works for me. Can you recheck it again? > > Zdenek > >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: