Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 479DEDF5.4090909@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 9:02 AM, in message >>>> > <87odb7s45i.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> > wrote: > > >> Perhaps we should have some form of escape hatch for pg_dump to request real >> physical order when dumping clustered tables. >> > > It would seem reasonable to me for pg_dump to use ORDER BY to select > data from clustered tables. > > I don't see a general case for worrying about the order of rows > returned by queries which lack an ORDER BY clause. > > > What will be the performance hit from doing that? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: