Re: best way to query
От | Steve Clark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: best way to query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 479A1A16.9090406@netwolves.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: best way to query (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > Steve Clark <sclark@netwolves.com> writes: > >>Tom Lane wrote: >> >>>Also, whatever is the ORDER BY for? > > >>without the order by it wants to do a seq scan of t_unit_event_log. >>see below: >> explain select count(*) from t_event_ack_log where event_log_no not >>in (select event_log_no from t_unit_event_log); >> QUERY PLAN >>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Aggregate (cost=12144872193.82..12144872193.82 rows=1 width=0) >> -> Seq Scan on t_event_ack_log (cost=0.00..12144871485.07 >>rows=283497 width=0) >> Filter: (NOT (subplan)) >> SubPlan >> -> Seq Scan on t_unit_event_log (cost=0.00..40286.56 >>rows=1021156 width=4) >>(5 rows) > > > Hmm, the big problem with that isn't the seqscan but the lack of a > Materialize step to buffer it; which says to me that you're running a > pretty old Postgres version (8.0 or older). You should think about an > update if you're running into performance issues. > > regards, tom lane > > Hi Tom, Actually this is show server_version; server_version ---------------- 8.2.5 On FreeBSD 6.2 And Daniel gave me a query that does the job in just a few seconds. Thanks, Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: