Re: best way to query
От | Steve Clark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: best way to query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 479A0D17.4040602@netwolves.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: best way to query (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: best way to query
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > Steve Clark <sclark@netwolves.com> writes: > >>explain shows: > > >> Aggregate (cost=4712921585.30..4712921585.31 rows=1 width=0) >> -> Seq Scan on t_event_ack_log a (cost=103170.29..4712920878.60 >>rows=282677 width=0) >> Filter: (NOT (subplan)) >> SubPlan >> -> Materialize (cost=103170.29..117301.92 rows=1016163 >>width=4) >> -> Index Scan using pk_tuel_eln on t_unit_event_log >> (cost=0.00..98184.12 rows=1016163 width=4) > > > Yeah, that's going to suck. A brute force solution is to see if you > can get it to switch to a "hashed subplan" by increasing work_mem. > > Also, whatever is the ORDER BY for? > > regards, tom lane > without the order by it wants to do a seq scan of t_unit_event_log. see below: explain select count(*) from t_event_ack_log where event_log_no not in (select event_log_no from t_unit_event_log); QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=12144872193.82..12144872193.82 rows=1 width=0) -> Seq Scan on t_event_ack_log (cost=0.00..12144871485.07 rows=283497 width=0) Filter: (NOT (subplan)) SubPlan -> Seq Scan on t_unit_event_log (cost=0.00..40286.56 rows=1021156 width=4) (5 rows) Will try increasing work_memory.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: