Re: Making the most of memory?
| От | Craig James |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Making the most of memory? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4797AC4E.6040007@emolecules.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Making the most of memory? (Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1@burntmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Guy Rouillier wrote: > Scott Marlowe wrote: >> I assume you're talking about solid state drives? They have their >> uses, but for most use cases, having plenty of RAM in your server will >> be a better way to spend your money. For certain high throughput, >> relatively small databases (i.e. transactional work) the SSD can be >> quite useful. > > Unless somebody has changes some physics recently, I'm not understanding > the recent discussions of SSD in the general press. Flash has a limited > number of writes before it becomes unreliable. On good quality consumer > grade, that's about 300,000 writes, while on industrial grade it's about > 10 times that. That's fine for mp3 players and cameras; even > professional photographers probably won't rewrite the same spot on a > flash card that many times in a lifetime. But for database > applications, 300,000 writes is trivial. 3 million will go a lot longer, > but in non-archival applications, I imagine even that mark won't take > but a year or two to surpass. One trick they use is to remap the physical Flash RAM to different logical addresses. Typical apps update a small percentageof the data frequently, and the rest of the data rarely or never. By shuffling the physical Flash RAM around,the media lasts a lot longer than a simple analysis might indicate. Craig
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: