Re: currval() within one statement
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: currval() within one statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4795B3D4.5020201@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: currval() within one statement (sad <sad@bankir.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: currval() within one statement
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
sad wrote: > A. Kretschmer wrote: > >>> is it expected that the currval() changes its value between calls >>> within one statement ? > >> Conclusion, don't call nextval() within a TRIGGER, and insert either >> nextval() for the column or omit this column. > > I only note that i still want to discuss the titled problem or to be > given an exact pointer to documentation regarding the currval() behavior > in the described situation, that i had. Well, the page in the docs isn't hard to find - http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/functions-sequence.html But surely it works exactly as you would expect it to. nextval(S) advances the sequence and returns the new value currval(S) returns the current value of sequence S, which is whatever the previous call to nextval(S) returned. In the even you haven't called nextval(S) then it is undefined. What do you think should happen? -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: