Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4794C7CC.3010902@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce
Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 21/01/2008, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> >>> Orafce is about to be approved for Fedora, and I need help for one of >>> the review items. Per: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c1 >>> > > AFAICT, there's nothing wrong with the Makefile. The problem is with > the specfile, which apparently is calling plain "make install". > It should read > > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install > > Devrim: you should be testing specfiles by building as non-root; > you would have caught this yourself. > > > Shouldn't one always build RPMs as non-root? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: