Re: Some ideas about Vacuum
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some ideas about Vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 478DF219.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Some ideas about Vacuum (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Some ideas about Vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:40 AM, in message <Pine.GSO.4.64.0801161233260.20980@westnet.com>, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Keep in mind that there are claims that a write-cache-enabled >> battery-backed RAID controller negates the effect of a separate spindle. > > "Negates" is a bit strong; there's still some performance advantage on > systems that write a serious amount of data. It's certainly true that a > BCC controller greatly reduces the need for a separate spindle. I haven't seen any benchmarks on the list or in our environment where the separate spindles gave more than a 1% increase in performance when using a good-quality BBC controller. Do you have results that show more of a difference? Can you share them? -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: