Re: Experiences with extensibility
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Experiences with extensibility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47848095.5050202@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Experiences with extensibility (Sim Zacks <sim@compulab.co.il>) |
Ответы |
count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Sim Zacks wrote: > We use postgresql because it is open source, we have in-house experience > to deal with it so we don't have any extra support costs and we don't > need the features that are offered in commercial products that > PostGreSQL does not have. We also don't need the speed that commercial > products offer that is missing in PostgreSQL. I use PostgreSQL because it has a ton of features the closed source products don't offer and is generally faster than the closed source solutions. Granted there are scenarios where others are FASTER (SELECT COUNT(*)) but I find that if you are doing those items, you normally have a weird design anyway. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: