Re: bug: ANALYZE progress report with inheritance tables
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bug: ANALYZE progress report with inheritance tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 477b3908-98cb-386b-a8bc-274e7203d388@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bug: ANALYZE progress report with inheritance tables (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 28/09/2023 19:06, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 22/01/2023 18:23, Justin Pryzby wrote: >> pg_stat_progress_analyze was added in v13 (a166d408e). >> >> For tables with inheritance children, do_analyze_rel() and >> acquire_sample_rows() are called twice. The first time through, >> pgstat_progress_start_command() has memset() the progress array to zero. >> >> But the 2nd time, ANALYZE_BLOCKS_DONE is already set from the previous >> call, and BLOCKS_TOTAL can be set to some lower value (and in any case a >> value unrelated to the pre-existing value of BLOCKS_DONE). So the >> progress report briefly shows a bogus combination of values and, with >> these assertions, fails regression tests in master and v13, unless >> BLOCKS_DONE is first zeroed. > > Good catch! > > I think the counts need do be reset even earlier, in > acquire_inherited_sample_rows(), at the same time that we update > PROGRESS_ANALYZE_CURRENT_CHILD_TABLE_RELID. See attached patch. > Otherwise, there's a brief moment where we have already updated the > child table ID, but the PROGRESS_ANALYZE_BLOCKS_TOTAL > PROGRESS_ANALYZE_BLOCKS_DONE still show the counts from the previous > child table. And if it's a foreign table, the FDW's sampling function > might not update the progress report at all, in which case the old > values will be displayed until the table is fully processed. Committed and backported. Thank you! -- Heikki Linnakangas Neon (https://neon.tech)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: